In 2022, several countries froze Russian assets following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. These frozen assets belong to the Central Bank of Russia and are estimated to be around €300 billion. The majority of these funds, approximately €190 billion, are stored in Belgium’s central security depository Euroclear. Smaller amounts are held in countries like France, the UK, Japan, Switzerland, and the US. These assets consist mainly of cash and government bonds, which generate income over time.
Background on Frozen Russian Assets
The income generated from these assets is currently used to repay loans given to Ukraine by G7 nations, amounting to $50 billion. However, the underlying assets themselves remain untouched. Countries like Ukraine, Poland, and the Baltic States have been urging European powers to go beyond the profits and seize the core funds to support Ukraine’s recovery. Despite these calls, key European capitals like Berlin, Paris, and Brussels have been cautious, fearing that seizing state property could set a dangerous precedent under international law.
The European Central Bank (ECB) has also voiced concerns that confiscating state-owned funds could damage the euro’s status as a safe and reliable option for foreign reserves. Since most of the frozen Russian assets are denominated in euros, any action could impact the euro’s global reputation.
Russia’s Fierce Response to Frozen Assets War
Discussion on Seizure Plans
Recent discussions among European powers like France, Germany, and the UK are exploring the possibility of seizing frozen Russian assets. These discussions are part of broader efforts to create a peace plan for Ukraine. The idea being considered is to link the seizure of these assets to a future ceasefire agreement in Ukraine. Under this proposal, if Russia were to violate the ceasefire, the frozen assets could be confiscated as a penalty. This approach is seen as a way to pressure Russia into following any future agreements while offering security guarantees to Ukraine.
Black Sea Crisis: Russia’s Desperate Naval Defense Amid Ukrainian Attacks
The renewed interest in asset seizure is partly driven by reduced military support from key allies. Some countries now see frozen Russian assets as an alternative way to provide financial aid to Ukraine. The UK has already taken a step in this direction by using profits from the frozen assets to back loans for Ukraine worth £2.26 billion. Meanwhile, Germany, which had previously opposed full seizure, is reviewing its stance and holding discussions with other European allies to align their positions.
France has proposed that frozen Russian assets could be seized only if Moscow breaches a future ceasefire agreement. This proposal has received support from several European countries, although no formal agreement has been reached. The ongoing discussions highlight the shifting positions among European powers as they search for new ways to support Ukraine without violating international laws.
Legal and Diplomatic Challenges
Seizing the core funds presents significant legal challenges. International laws protect state-owned assets, making their confiscation a highly sensitive issue. France has emphasized that immediate seizure without legal justification would not respect international law. Instead, the French proposal suggests that the frozen funds could become part of negotiations once the war ends, offering leverage to ensure Russia’s compliance with any agreements.
Germany’s leadership is currently weighing its options. The country’s new leadership is in talks to align its position with other European nations before key meetings with EU leaders. The UK government acknowledges that while using profits from the assets is already happening, accessing the underlying funds is far more complex. The issue remains under legal review, with European officials consulting with experts on how to navigate international regulations.
Diplomatic efforts are also ongoing to build consensus among European allies. Some countries remain cautious, worried about the broader implications of seizing state assets. The discussions continue as European leaders seek ways to balance legal concerns, diplomatic relations, and the urgent need to support Ukraine. Despite the challenges, the idea of using frozen Russian assets as leverage in future negotiations is gaining momentum, with more countries showing openness to the proposal.