In a rare and bold statement, White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller dismissed the idea that Denmark would defend Greenland. He spoke about the possibility of the United States seeking control of the territory. Miller said that acquiring Greenland is in the best interest of NATO and global security. His comments sparked surprise and curiosity among political watchers worldwide.
Miller Highlights US Interest in Greenland Amid Social Media Buzz
The remarks came during a tense exchange with CNN’s Jake Tapper on Monday. Tapper asked Miller about recent social media activity by his wife, Katie Miller. She had posted a map of Greenland in American flag colors with the caption “SOON.” The post fueled speculation about President Donald Trump’s intentions toward the Arctic territory.
Miller responded by stressing the United States’ long-standing interest in Greenland. He said that President Trump has been clear for months that the U.S. should include Greenland in its security strategy. “The president has been clear for months now that the United States should be the nation that has Greenland as part of our overall security apparatus,” Miller said.
“Ask Me in 20 Days”: Trump’s Greenland Remark Sparks Fears of New U.S. Arctic Power Play
He also claimed that this position has been consistent since the start of Trump’s administration. “It has been the formal position of the U.S. government, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States,” Miller explained.
Miller Questions Denmark’s Claim Over Greenland
During a discussion, Miller was asked whether the United States would rule out military action to acquire Greenland. He dismissed the idea, pointing out that Greenland has a small population of about 30,000 people.
“It wouldn’t be military action against Greenland,” Miller said. “The real question is by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim?” His comments drew attention as he openly questioned Denmark’s authority over the island.
Miller argued that the U.S., as the strongest military power in NATO, has a responsibility to secure the Arctic. He said that U.S. control of Greenland would strengthen NATO and protect allied interests. “For the United States to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend NATO, obviously, Greenland should be part of the United States,” he explained. Miller added that this is a conversation the U.S. will continue to have with international partners.
U.S. weighs direct role in Greenland rare earths development through $50 million plan
Despite the provocative tone, Miller stressed that he was not suggesting immediate military action. When Tapper pressed about the possibility of force, Miller chuckled, saying Tapper was fishing for a headline. He emphasized that no country would fight the United States over Greenland.
“The United States should have Greenland as part of the United States,” Miller said. “There’s no need to even think or talk about this as a military operation. Nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.”
Context: Trump’s Bold Moves Stir Global Debate
Miller’s remarks came just days after the Trump administration carried out a controversial operation to capture Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, a move that sent shockwaves through international politics. World leaders were left questioning what Washington might do next.
President Trump also hinted at possible geopolitical shakeups involving Colombia and Greenland, sparking further speculation. Observers note that Greenland is strategically vital due to its Arctic location. The island holds significant natural resources and serves as a key point for military and surveillance operations in the North Atlantic. For decades, Denmark has controlled Greenland, but the United States has long shown interest in expanding its influence in the region.
Miller emphasized that U.S. interest in Greenland is not new. “The president has been very clear about this. That is the formal position of the U.S. government,” he said, referring to the ongoing goal of bringing Greenland under U.S. security control.
New year, new red line: Denmark’s PM delivers stark warning on Greenland
The exchange between Miller and CNN’s Jake Tapper drew attention and criticism. Media outlets questioned the tone of his comments, while analysts debated the legal and diplomatic implications of challenging Denmark’s sovereignty.
By framing Greenland as a strategic asset for NATO, Miller highlighted the U.S. role in Arctic security and regional stability. Although Denmark has not officially responded, his remarks have added tension to U.S.-Denmark relations and raised questions about how far the U.S. might pursue its Arctic ambitions.